Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandy Alexandre (porn star)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy Keep.  Voice of All T 19:31, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Brandy Alexandre (porn star)
The inclusion of real names of porn stars violates privacy and subjects to many dangers. See email sent to helpdesk. SavvyCat 02:26, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment her name is in IMDB as well so I don't see that as a problem. I guess I just need to know what would make a porn star notable enough for a wikipedia article? --Pboyd04 02:54, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Her name pops up in multiple places on Google. Seems like a perfectly legitimate article to me, though it might be able to use a bit of fixing. - Bootstoots 02:56, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Subject is notable. Can the nominator provide evidence that the information was obtained "illegally and made public by stalkers"? If so, then the claim can be independently verified. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 03:06, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. One of the great performers of her day. -- JJay 03:26, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep article is legit and it's even got sources. -- Rune Welsh | &tau;&alpha;&lambda;&kappa; | Esperanza  03:36, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. To claim that sex-industry film stars are somehow less noteworthy than "mainstream" actors poses an issue of bias.  Smerdis of Tlön 04:56, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep the real names of several entertainers are listed here, why should Ms. Alexandre get a free pass? -- MisterHand 05:37, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets notability requirements. VegaDark 09:37, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - very notable. Essexmutant 15:39, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete The living person has moved on, and living an ordinary life, is not notable. Fred Bauder 21:25, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, unless we're supposed to delete every President's article once he leaves office. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:30, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep the article, delete the unverifiable real name that was obtained by original research ➥the Epopt 05:30, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I don't see any reason why this article has anything special that qualifies it for deletion. NorseOdin 22:11, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep the subject of the article is as legitimate a subject as any other adult film actor or actress. Glowimperial 22:15, 30 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.