Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brasserie de l'Abbaye du Val-Dieu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 03:50, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Brasserie de l'Abbaye du Val-Dieu

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non Notable brewery; no claim to any significance; no suitable merge target fails WP:GNG. Mt king  (edits)  22:38, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete An average European brewery which produces three average beers. Does not appear to have attracted media attention.  I agree that it fails the general notability guideline.  The single media reference is inadequate for notability. --Bejnar (talk) 22:53, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Why would Val-Dieu Abbey not be a suitable merge target?--Tikiwont (talk) 13:22, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete and merge information with Val-Dieu Abbey, which already has a section about their brewery. I can't find any evidence in English or French that the brewery or its products are 'notable' in their own right. Sionk (talk) 16:42, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 11 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete and merge with Val-Dieu Abbey. The only notability is that there are very very few abbey beers that are actually brewn inside the abbey they are named for, as opposed to an independent brewery which just markets the brand. Filipvr (talk) 12:57, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Or integrate with the abbey article and make it into a redirect. I dont know what guidelines for those are, these days. It occurs to me that people are really eager to just delete things... Filipvr (talk) 13:00, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.