Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brattleboro Free Folk Festival


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (non-admin closure) MrScorch6200  (talk &#124; ctrb) 01:26, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Brattleboro Free Folk Festival

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:GNG. could not find any indepth coverage. The 2nd source provided any mentions this festival in one line. LibStar (talk) 12:11, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vermont-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 17:46, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 17:46, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 17:46, 24 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep I normally vote Delete if an article "needs work" and I don't plan on being the one to work on it, however, since this doesn't seem overly promotional I say we keep it based on the hope someone will better source it by adding info from this book - [] - and this article on a pseudo-RS website maintained by a notable person who yet has had a WP article created for them, but is mentioned repeatedly in Metamodernism - []. I think those two items, when combined with the semi-robust mention in Pitchfork and the passing acknowledgment in Utne Reader would be sufficient to maintain a stub. BlueSalix (talk) 21:26, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:28, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 11:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.