Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brave Destiny


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 23:02, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Brave Destiny

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested prod. No claim of notability here, rather this is a billboard for promoting a nonnotable event, and nonnotable people. This looks more like a magazine article, not an encyclopedia article.  RepublicanJacobite  TheFortyFive 01:06, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Inadequately sourced. Insufficient evidence of notability. Significant evidence of shenanigans. Rklawton (talk) 01:38, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable, non-encyclopedic...Modernist (talk) 02:04, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep very notable and well sourced. has a major article in Art & Antiques magazine. attempted removal is personal bias108.46.98.78 (talk) 16:35, 3 November 2011 (UTC) — 108.46.98.78 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete even if we believe 108.46.98.78 and assume that the article pass WP:GNG, article is still non-encyclopedic. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 16:47, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Reads as add copy of an event notable only to those who took part in it. MarnetteD | Talk 17:38, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 3 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence of notability here as per WP:EVENT  Catfish  Jim  and the soapdish  20:00, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - blatantly promotional blather about non-notable event; full of unsourced grandiose claims, rather than solid sourced references. Every time fluff is removed, the s.p.a. whines and makes false accusations of "vandalism". -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  17:07, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.