Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brayer

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 03:02, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)

Brayer
Wiktionary already had an entry for Brayer so I moved the contents of this article along with the relevant edit history to the Wiktionary article's talk page. The wiktionarians can do with the info what they like. I don't see this every becoming a meaningful article. Kevin Rector 20:06, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, already in Wiktionary. Megan1967 23:14, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep real things. Real things often have a history, methods and materials of construction, people who make them, people who use them, techniques with which they are used, asthetic considerations... Kappa 01:55, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. If Wiktionary has an article on lion, should we get rid of our article on lions. The article is currently a useful stub and the brayer is used in printmaking, linocut and collography. Given its uses, I am sure that the article can be expanded further. Capitalistroadster 06:58, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * While it's true that brayers are real things, that doesn't mean that the Wikipedia article about it is anything more than an dictionary definition. I sure hope that the inclusion criteria for the Wikipedia is more than being a noun. Kevin Rector 07:42, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)


 * Agree with Kevin's comment. So merge this into an article on some common application of brayers. Radiant_* 09:52, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment The relevant criteria is not whether the article is currently a stub but whether the article can ever be expanded past that point. Im my view, this article can be. As the brayer is useful in a number of crafts it is difficult to merge. Capitalistroadster 15:36, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, can't think where it would merge. -- Jmabel | Talk 01:06, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.