Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brayton Purcell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:10, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Brayton Purcell

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

As law firms go, this is not a particularly large or far-reaching entity. I do not think this meets WP:NCORP. BD2412 T 18:51, 22 July 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:43, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Companies.  BD2412  T 18:51, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:39, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete 45 lawyers isn't that large of a firm, nothing national. Big city law office. No sources found. Oaktree b (talk) 23:08, 1 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.