Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brayut Tourist Village


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 12:03, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Brayut Tourist Village

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NOTE A small attraction with no major notability through either news or speciality Amortias (T)(C) 10:13, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:11, 10 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Merge to Sleman. May not be independently notable, but the Slemen article presently doesn't mention it. I found this article which verifies Brayut Tourist Village's existence in Slemen. NorthAmerica1000 02:53, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔  17:08, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 12:42, 26 May 2014 (UTC)


 * delete fails WP:GNG. So small and insignificant I oppose merge as well. LibStar (talk) 13:14, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep: This appears to an actual populated place over which the government has created a "tourist village" to attract tourism. It does need some improvement, however.--Milowent • hasspoken  13:20, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Alright, here's the deal. A "tourist village" appears to be marketing term most often used in the Special Region of Yogyakarta in Java in Indonesia.  (I've just created Tourist village, which has an article on the Indonesian wiki, id:Desa wisata.  Its really just a populated place where they hope to bring in more tourists, and a populated place will always be ripe for having an article as long as its existence can be verified, which it can here.--Milowent • hasspoken  14:12, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, they are quite common here in Yogyakarta. I know four or five off the top of my head. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:24, 4 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per general outcomes for populated places and references proving existence in the article. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:24, 4 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per Crisco - seemingly a real and populated place with "tourist village" added as a tourist draw card. Successful or not, that doesn't stop is from being a real place.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 11:41, 5 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per Milowent and Crisco. --Bejnar (talk) 17:55, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.