Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brazil (public relations agency)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 01:29, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Brazil (public relations agency)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability. The article before my edits was supported by bare URLs to PRWeek, but all of them were broken links. I found one here, but it was the type of sources I was expecting that does not really suggest notability. It's interesting that their website says "For more information about us, please go to Wikipedia." Not a bad thing I suppose, though it suggests the likelihood of COI editing (or possibly they just felt Wikipedia was a good source of neutral information?) CorporateM (Talk) 17:15, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 17 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Not a single print publication anywhere, first source is a self-interview, article has so many citations as if trying to cover up its own lack of notability. Bottom line: Does not appear to meet the requirements of WP:ORG.  KDS 4444  Talk  20:06, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.