Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brazilian Consulate General, San Francisco


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 11:14, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Brazilian Consulate General, San Francisco

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. all this article does is confirm the consulate exists. embassies are not inherently notable and consulates even less so. LibStar (talk) 06:06, 11 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 20:28, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete a consulate general is not something that would be inherently notable, and there are no sources to say anything about it - it exists, so what Kraxler (talk) 21:45, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   15:45, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable on its own and Wikipedia is not a map service as to location, either. Kierzek (talk) 17:52, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable simply for being. Fails WP:GNG. J bh  Talk  18:04, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete or preferably redirect to List of diplomatic missions in San Francisco in case a better article can ever be made as my searches found nothing better than Books and browser links. SwisterTwister   talk  05:20, 23 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.