Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brazilian Film Festival of London


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:20, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Brazilian Film Festival of London

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested PROD : Non Notable Film Festival, promotional in nature. Codf1977 (talk) 17:45, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:14, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - The two references since added to the article indicate that it meets the general notability guide. In addition, being 'promotional in nature' isn't an argument for deletion - it's an argument to remove the promotional text, which I have done. Finally, it can't be unduly promotional if it's about an event which happened in the past - it finished on 5 September. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 19:49, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Coverage is not significant rather more WP:ROUTINE in nature. Codf1977 (talk) 21:26, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Might become notable someday, but isn't now. Of the two references provided, one is from The Guardian, a Reliable Source, but is just a routine one-paragraph calendar item. The other reference is from an online magazine specializing in South American topics. Nothing else found in a Google search. --MelanieN (talk) 19:37, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 03:20, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per Chase me ladies - Ret.Prof (talk) 04:23, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete – It is not clear to me in what way the article asserts notability about the event. Lambanog (talk) 17:57, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.