Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brazzers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Nomination is a blocked sockpuppet, no other arguments for deletion. Fences &amp;  Windows  23:56, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Brazzers

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

 Merge Delete into the porn website page as this alone has few links and is not very notable on its own as well as it contains slang. After looking at both pages, I don't think it really needs any kind of reference on Wikipedia. - Mykee881211, 16:05pm GMT 4/1/10
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. Eastmain (talk) 21:29, 4 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: The nominator has been blocked indefinitely. See User talk:Mykee881211. Dancter (talk) 21:34, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Request this AfD nomination be terminated, as the nominator has been found guilty of sockpuppeting. With his other accounts he has also nominated a couple of other articles for deletion on equally shaky grounds. Failing that, I would suggest a keep for the article, as the site in question is indeed a major American online pornography outlet, and is backed up by numerous references, most notably its Alexa ranking. Edit: I see Dancter is one step ahead of me, as ever! KaySL (talk) 21:37, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, as KaySL has already stated, the nominator has been found guilty of sockpuppeting and this article does have numerous references and is in detail meaning that it is a notable reference. Superfazar (talk) 21:48, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Has reliable sources. Epbr123 (talk) 23:31, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.