Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bread's Crumbs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:SNOW. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:52, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Bread's Crumbs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable short film. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. I can't find any decent sources on it to indicate it's worthy of an article. clpo13(talk) 19:13, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 19:14, 30 April 2016 (UTC)


 * BEFORE:
 * filmmaker:
 * producer:


 * Delete While wished to be deleted within hours of being contributed by an inexperienced editor, seems a bit rushed. THAT STATED, it appears to be a WP:COI by purported production company of author LordStarscream100and part of a walled garden in progress. 3000 hits on youtube is zilch.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 23:10, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as wisher for deletion, and still believer that youtube videos qualify for speedy under A7. (addendum) That youtube videos unrecognized by other secondary sources qualify for A7 as web content. Timothy Joseph Wood  23:25, 30 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment: Looks like the person only publishes via YT, so the other articles could likely be deleted under A7 criteria. I'm going to go ahead and close this early since there's really no chance of this passing notability guidelines even if this goes out for a full week. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:50, 1 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.