Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bread in the cuisine of Singapore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merge to cuisine of Singapore. To echo nadav, I've only tagged it for the merge, since I've no idea what would be relevant for the target article. - Bobet 09:27, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Bread in the cuisine of Singapore

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is basically a personal essay that violates WP:OR. Perhaps the references in the bottom somehow relate to the article text, but if they do, it is still obviously WP:SYN. It would require a total and complete rewrite of this article for it to be acceptable, and the relevant material is in Cuisine of Singapore anyway. nadav 18:56, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I should note that this article bore the WP:PROD template for 5 days without objection, and also that it is a member of the Wikipedia talk:NUS Scholars Programme series of articles. nadav 19:01, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It was under prod for "ridiculous name" (Dawn of the leavened), and at 11:51, 25 April 2007 I moved it to Bread in the cuisine of Singapore. Anthony Appleyard 22:40, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The other (and more significant) reason for the proposed deletion was that the article is a fork of bread. nadav 01:22, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge into cuisine of Singapore. Sort of sourced so it's sort of keepable. &mdash;Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-26 00:29Z 
 * Merge Ditto that. --Remi 09:15, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Respectfully, if you all think merging is the best thing to do here, I challenge one of you to do it. I don't want to start sifting through the giant haystack of OR for the little needles of sourceable material that may or may not be there and that aren't already in Cuisine of Singapore or bread.  nadav 09:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge. It gives a good and seemingly accurate overview of a type of cuisine in the country. The language can be cleaned up, but I don't see any serious OR problem. --Vsion 02:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge per all above. ~ G1ggy!  blah, blah, blah 06:02, 2 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.