Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bread in the cuisine of Singapore (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete, as original research without enough reliable sources. - Krakatoa  Katie  22:12, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Bread in the cuisine of Singapore
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The previous nomination for this page ended with a merge decision, but the closing admin admitted that it was hard to find what was worth merging from this piece. A month has passed and the merge has still not been performed, so I am renominating. The reasons to delete are the same as last time: ''This is basically a personal essay that violates WP:OR. Perhaps the references in the bottom somehow relate to the article text, but if they do, it is still obviously WP:SYN. It would require a total and complete rewrite of this article for it to be acceptable, and the relevant material is in Cuisine of Singapore anyway.'' nadav (talk) 02:37, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - Why not be bold and do the merge yourself, rather than running this through AfD again? Sanpete Slim 02:57, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Because the template on the page said to renominate if the merge is not promptly completed, and I personally believe there is no non-OR content that can be merged. nadav (talk) 03:08, 8 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 03:01, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy close as merge. The previous Afd was fine; someone needs to do the merge. John Vandenberg 03:01, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I still think there is nothing worth merging. And there is no justification for a speedy keep. nadav (talk) 03:04, 8 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. In spite of the previous merge decision, nobody seemed interested in actually merging any of this content and it's just been left to linger.  I agree with the nom that there is no sourced information in this article worth merging anywhere.  Just delete it.  Ark yan  &#149; (talk) 15:01, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with the fact that it is a basically a personal essay. Kyriakos 22:44, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.