Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breakbeard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:45, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Breakbeard

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Per WP:MUSIC: A nice, solid looking article at first, but a read of the contents shows it to be yet another myspace-band. User removed speedy tag without comment;user removed notability and inline-citations tags without comment. Fribbler (talk) 19:08, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not meet WP:MUSIC guidelines. No significant coverage from reliable sources that I can see, their 1st EP, produced by their own record label, has not been released yet.-- Beloved Freak  19:18, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   --  Beloved  Freak  19:19, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, nonnotable band, doesn't meet WP:MUSIC, written like a promo piece. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:32, 2 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Non notable and per above  ·Add§hore·  T alk /C ont 21:38, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 01:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, does not meet WP:BAND. Article is very well written but boils down to saying that they've self-published an album and have played some small venues, plus some trivia. References says they were mentioned in SF Station, but that's just an events calendar site, and a search for the band's name there brought up nothing. BTW, I had to laugh when I read the bit about how "Breakbeard rules!" is their slogan. I mean, "* rules" is just a basic shout of appreciation. It's not exactly noteworthy that somebody would shout it at a concert. &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 18:16, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Very low google hits. Article does not have any authoritative refs. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 04:11, 6 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.