Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breakdown (Transformers)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Stunticons. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:14, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Breakdown (Transformers)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This does not establish notability independent of Transformers through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 16:39, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Stunticons. Not independently notable. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:55, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 19 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:51, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Keep - Article has notable citations, and covers several major anime characters. Mathewignash (talk) 01:50, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:07, 3 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Stunticons. No significant coverage in reliable, secondary independent sources, fails WP:GNG.Folken de Fanel (talk) 20:01, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep or Redirect to Stunticons, we do not delete all of the Transformers articles because there notable. JJ98 (Talk) 01:11, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.