Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breaking news 2

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was - redirected - SimonP 05:17, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)

Breaking news
Dicdef, added to Wiktionary (Breaking news). ral315 20:43, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Keep or merge with news. Real thing. Kappa 22:11, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Obviously a dicdef, already on Wiktionary. --Fastfission 22:39, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to News or keep. Currently a dictdef but has potential.  JYolkowski 22:46, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, dicdef of a trivial word construction, potential fork, a re-direct is a good idea. Wyss 01:49, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect. -Sean Curtin 06:17, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Meelar (talk) 07:14, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to news - David Gerard 15:03, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Expand with examples, as I'm against deleting stubs, which have potential. TAS 15:05, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect, roughly the same thing as news. Radiant! 13:44, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)