Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breaking the Circle of Satanic Ritual Abuse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Fritzpoll (talk) 13:15, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Breaking the Circle of Satanic Ritual Abuse

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No indication that the book passes notability criteria for books. A single review, in 1992, of non-popular interest does not meet criteria 1. It has won no awards, led to the creation of no motion pictures, plays, art or movements, is not the subject of a course at any level, and the book's author is not significant. Any book that gets a review in a peer-reviewed journal does not automatically get an article. The book was published 17 years ago, left no impact, and is not notable. The creator of the article is a [confirmed sockpuppet of the banned [[User:ResearchEditor]], now permablocked for sockpuppeting to evade a community ban.   WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/complex 12:28, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Doesn't even seem to be cited in relevant WP articles. Rd232 talk 13:00, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete About 200 worldCat libraries do have it, but during the period of peak interest, most academic libraries bought essentially everything that was published on the subject. No noticeable impact. DGG (talk) 16:07, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: per WP:NOT.. South Bay  (talk) 20:19, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak abstain. I abstain. Cashewbrick 3:44, 6 April 2009


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.