Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breana McDow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. causa sui (talk) 18:15, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Breana McDow

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable person; fails WP:ENTERTAINER with only one significant role in anything (and the thing happens to be an unreleased project by her fiance). Article was created by the subject or by a relative, and most of the work on it and linking it from other articles was likewise done by a user that appears to have a COI, so it's a vanity page as well. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 08:35, 10 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete I think the article is written ok.  However, Ms. McDow appears not to have done anything notable yet.  According to IMDB, the film she will be in is still filming.  So, can't yet use her film role to assess nobility.  Also, I think the film has a budget of $500,000.  That leaves some ads and video music work, which doesn't amount to much.  I couldn't find any reliable sources. Bgwhite (talk) 08:52, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 20:34, 10 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Music videos and commercial spots fail WP:ENT. Lack of any coverage at all fails WP:GNG.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 04:22, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clearly fails WP:GNG. The performances in ads and music videos aren't significant, so they don't work for WP:NACTOR. The film itself seems to have just finished filming, and so it hasn't shown whether it's significant or not, but I'd say that it's not significant enough.--Slon02 (talk) 17:32, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.