Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breath Counter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The claim of notability falls down owing to lack of evidence, seems like Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:03, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Breath Counter

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seeking redirect to Abhay Bang.Apparently at this venue, since the article creator has certain problems with my workflow. Winged Blades of Godric On leave 16:36, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Even a redirect would be  inappropriate. This is a trivial device--an abacus on which a child moves beads to record his breath. The abacus was invented many centuries ago, and the application is insignificant. There is no reason for it to be mentioned anywhere. Writing an article on this, and especially insisting on it, is an indication of COI editing.   DGG ( talk ) 17:27, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing unique or significant about the invention. Adamgerber80 (talk) 18:44, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep This simple instrument has helped to save thousands of lives in the rural and tribal parts of Gadchiroli. This instrument is used by illiterate health care workers to save lives of newborns. This has surely helped India to reduce child mortality indirectly. Hence this instrument and hence the article is surely notable. -- Abhijeet Safai (talk) 05:56, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Citation needed. I don't see any citations that support your claim here. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 17:17, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per DGG. That something is very useful is not the same as it being notable (according to Wikipedia's definition of notability). --bonadea contributions talk 14:24, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 17:17, 3 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.