Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breathe-A-BULL


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:02, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Breathe-A-BULL

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unencyclopedic stuff. Deletion contested –Ammarpad (talk) 20:40, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * You should contest the deletion here too. –Ammarpad (talk) 20:42, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm not going to contest the deletion here, as my involvement was purely procedural. "Unencyclopedic news" is not one of wikipedia's strict criteria for speedy deletion. &#123;&#123;3x&#124;p&#125;&#125;ery (talk) 20:44, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * You know it is unencyclopedic and can never be retained but you are being compulsively formalistic on something you don't have ability to do. It was deleted a such before. –Ammarpad (talk) 20:49, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Wikipedia does not have a speedy delete criterion to cover this, but we can ignore all rules and make the rapid determination that one campus' smoking regulations are not the proper material for an entire encyclopedia article. These are not ground-breaking rules that have been the topic of widespread press coverage because of their radical departure from some norms. The author had claimed when contesting the original speedy deletion that "This page is made to inform the public about USF's tobacco and smoke-free policy. As part of my class project was to add to a Wikipedia page with reliable information you have and presenting it. Therefore I have done such and continue to add over the week with reliable information and sources to back it all up." Clearly, an academic assignment where the teacher failed to properly educate the students on the proper uses of Wikipedia. I've informed the author that they and their teacher should refer to WP:SUP. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:51, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Although I would usually advocate a merge for a topic like this, it just doesn't have a place in the USF article letalone a whole article. startTerminal (haha wow talk page | startTerminal on irc) 01:01, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 05:59, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 05:59, 17 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. Trivial and reads like an essay piece. Clearly not notable for stand alone article. Kierzek (talk) 12:38, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Trivia, not encyclpedic, WP:NOTNEWS, take your choice....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:47, 17 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.