Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breathe Carolina


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. WP:SNOW  MBisanz  talk 22:47, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Breathe Carolina

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced, appears to fail both NMG, both criteria 1 and 4. Sceptre (talk) 03:51, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable; fails WP:BAND. It's another case of the record label article being used to get a foot on the door and claim notability. § FreeRangeFrog 04:45, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Reversing, band charted on the Billboard 200 = meets WP:MUSIC. And that's a wrap folks. § FreeRangeFrog 05:26, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Unless we consider that "heatseekers" chart to be a valid measure of notability? § FreeRangeFrog 04:57, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep The nominator is not doing his homework. This band charted at #186 in the United States . Chubbles (talk) 05:14, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Chubbles, FreeRangeFrog Wacko Jack O   06:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Chubbles.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 11:17, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.