Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breathing (lens)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 04:59, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Breathing (lens)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:N. Two of the sources are just youtube videos, and the other does not contain SIGCOV. NW1223&lt;Howl at me&bull;My hunts&gt; 20:12, 25 July 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:24, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:02, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Please have a look at WP:BEFORE prior to doing this kind of thing. The crux for determining notability is what sources are available, rather than what is currently included in the article. In this case, there is plenty of high-quality background material that could be included together with less fancy but still informative stuff . Clearly a thing, clearly sourceable. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:33, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep per the sources provided by . — Sirdog (talk) 21:23, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources provided above. ARandomName123(talk)Ping me! 00:37, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources provided. -- A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 00:49, 3 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.