Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breathing Space Scotland


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:03, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Breathing Space Scotland

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

a relatively local organization, with no evidence of notability  DGG ( talk ) 16:06, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 17:29, 23 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment I have added a reference to the organisation's sign-language helpline winning an award. If the conclusion of this AfD is that the organisation has insufficient notability for an article in its own right, a content merge into NHS 24 may be appropriate? AllyD (talk) 17:43, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 23 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep This looks to me like a national organization, with coverage in a number of national secondary sources. However, its name would appear to be "Breathing Space" and a move of some sort should be considered. Ben   Mac  Dui  07:53, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep meets WP:GNG with the sources supplied, plus more sources here, here. (Oh, don't let Alex Salmond hear you call Scotland "relatively local" - have you seen how they settle debates up there?) Ritchie333  (talk)  (cont)   13:56, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:39, 30 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep clearly there are adequate sources here for this org (as above), from a google search, while not mentioned in news very much, it is referred to by government websites.Deathlibrarian (talk) 02:07, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment -- The article is not clear, but it looks to me as if it is the counselling aspect of the national NHS 24. As suhc it is should certainly be notable, though the article clearly needs improvement.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:47, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.