Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bree Condon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep--Ymblanter (talk) 10:51, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Bree Condon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn (talk) 21:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  21:50, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  21:50, 9 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. She has had some attention for her career, in particular for replacing the iconic Dolores Erickson as the cover girl on the 2006 remix/reissue of Whipped Cream & Other Delights: The New Yorker ; The Wall Street Journal ; Honolulu Star Bulletin ; etc.  Otherwise, the bulk of the sources turned up in a Google search relate to a bizarre 2010 incident in which she was the object, and a victim, of an identity theft scam.  That incident doesn't directly contribute to her notability, of course.  One of the many news reports about this, in the Los Angeles Times, describes her as "a successful model and aspiring actress" and a "minor celebrity", and makes this comment about the actual but limited nature of her notability: "Men could verify that she was a working model and keep track of her photo shoots and acting gigs online, but she wasn't so famous that tabloids might write about who she was actually dating." --Arxiloxos (talk) 02:16, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 10 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per Arxiloxos. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:28, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.