Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breezango


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There does not seem to be evidence of notability at all here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:35, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Breezango

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Much like the Social Outcasts and the Golden Truth, this article relies on move sets and week by week updates. Nick ag 989 talk 19:16, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions.  Nick ag 989 talk 19:19, 20 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nomination. They have done nothing notable so far and we should wait until they do make an article for the team.&#42;Treker (talk) 19:53, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Obvious delete I used this as an example of a tag team which clearly fails WP:GNG on WT:PW.LM2000 (talk) 07:45, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above. Prefall  08:46, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. While still a recent formation, they are a notable team. That the team has been involved in various team feuds while both individuals have not appered as singles wrestlers (in contrast to Jeri-KO) indicates that the team is now a stable entity. Str1977 (talk) 14:49, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG and relies on week by week updates.  Sekyaw  (talk)  19:41, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as mentioned by nominator and Sekyaw  this is a case of WP:NOT#NEWSREPORTS Burroughs&#39;10 (talk) 19:23, 27 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.