Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brehznitch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   - Brehznitching's 15 minutes is over, obvious delete - Peripitus (Talk) 12:44, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Brehznitch

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A non-notable argot that was recently invented and has little chance of being documented by reliable sources. This is an encyclopedia and as such is not for things made up at school one day.

This is a contested PROD, no reason for contesting given Mattinbgn\talk 09:00, 27 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\talk 09:01, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong delete not a single mention of it anywhere else. Hut 8.5 10:38, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Wikipedia has high standard requirements for even notable memes, so those most likely made up by the article's creator don't deserve their own article at all. Anyone can create a pseudolanguage or secret encoding for speech. Kotiwalo (talk) 10:47, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. - TexMurphy (talk) 12:25, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete meets CSD:G1. Nevard (talk) 14:13, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, I live in the Brisbane area of Australia, and I've never heard of it. Wikipedia is not for stuff just made up one day.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 22:54, 28 July 2009 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

haha. you guys are all a bunch of losers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickysavage (talk • contribs) 08:15, 4 August 2009 (UTC)