Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breion Diamond


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 05:44, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Breion Diamond

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:N, WP:BIO and WP:PORNBIO. SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 15:46, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Question: Is it common for porn titles to include the name of the main performer? If not, I'd say that would convey notability. Also see WP:JUSTAPOLICY A nomination should explain why an article fails the mentioned guidelines so people can't just throw in a couple of guidelines that don't actually apply. - Mgm|(talk) 22:21, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  coccyx bloccyx  (toccyx)  22:19, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * As per my comment, the nom failed to provide a proper reasoning. - Mgm|(talk) 22:21, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil (talk) 23:47, 28 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Sorry? I'll reword my nomination:
 * This article fails Wikipedia's guidelines on Notability of Articles, Notability of Biographies and Notability of Pornography Articles. The subject of the article is not notable enough to have an article.
 * As to your other question, I believe it is common for porn titles to include the main performer. But as WP:PORNBIO says, anyone can make a porn (or 17, since they are often mashups), so simply starring in a porn does not make him notable. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 01:29, 29 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom as well as the suspected conflict of interest with the creator, who has only edited promotional articles dealing with the black gay porn industry. Themfromspace (talk) 22:38, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * No groundless allegations, please. The creator has no connection at all, except personal interest, with the porn industry.GBataille (talk) 21:27, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The nomination is clear as day to me, no need to elaborate any further.  JBsupreme (talk) 06:17, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:PORNBIO. Tatarian (talk) 12:55, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Tabercil (talk) 23:49, 30 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.