Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bremen Fife FC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 06:08, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Bremen Fife FC

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Amateur sports team; does not meet WP:NSPORTS. Contested prod. ... disco spinster   talk  04:11, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:21, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - completely non-notable club. Alleged coverage in the Niagara Falls Review can't be confirmed, as articles cited don't seem to exist -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:21, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - low level club, not notable by any stretch of the imagination. GiantSnowman 13:56, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - low level recreational team. Very clearly non-notable. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:43, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Okay, granted, the links need to be fixed, but as I've argued on the page's discussion, how can anybody even begin to try to define what "notable" means? Wikipedia's criteria for what can be defined as "notable" is a complete joke. Notability is a completely subjective term whether you happen to try to define in finite terms or not. So when wikipedia says ""Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. That's our commitment." Who's going to tell me that mission statement is bogus, and that what we really want to do is be exclusionist. For what? To save paper? If even only one single person on this earth wants to get more information about this club on wikipedia, then leaving the page up should be worth it, according to wikipedia themselves, and frankly anyone disputing that is doing a disservice to the site. Please note the wikipedia mission statement does not read:""Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the knowledge that the people who use wikipedia the most deem notable using some ridiculous criteria that we'll enforece in order to give us something to do. That's our commitment." Keen 3 (talk) 14:58, 17 November 2010 (UTC) — Keen 3 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Also, searching through many of the other pages for local football clubs very similar to this, the only reason I can see this page being up for deletion is because it's new and therefore drawn attention. Without difficulty, I was able to find dozens of clubs, just football clubs, of similar size and level that also have pages. Deleting this because of notability would be egregious.Keen 3 (talk) 23:18, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Feel free to nominate any of those articles for deletion and they will be considered on their own merits -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:04, 19 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete low level recreational team, not notable. Article suggests they may go pro someday, but that day isn't today. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  23:28, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't even find any info on the web about the league they play, it's not even mentioned on the Ontario Soccer Association's website, suggesting that they play at a very non-notable level. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 11:22, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.