Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brenda Liz Lopez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  00:10, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Brenda Liz Lopez
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Winning a beauty contest is not in and of itself a sign of notability. The sourcing in the article is to a once sentence mention in a newspaper article, this is not enough to pass GNG ever. A search for more sourcing found a non-reliable entry in IMDb, and a bunch of other non-reliable sources and a few Wikipedia mirrors but no reliable, substnatial coverage to add toward passing GNG. This article has been tagged for needing more sources for 9 years and existed in this insubstantial state for 11 years. John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:37, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:51, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:51, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  14:55, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  14:55, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - at best this is a WP:BLP1E; way short of GNG; this shouldn't have existed for 11 days let alone 11 years Spiderone  14:56, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The scary thing is I have seen articles with less sourcing that have lasted over 15 years.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:15, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * So she couldn't claim notoriety even as the subject of a longest-lasting WP article without a challenge. Mercy11 (talk) 22:06, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, that would be a horrible case of self-referentialness. However she is not even close. Barahir lasted for over 15 (maybe even over 16) years with 0 sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:11, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northern Escapee (talk) 17:48, 5 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.