Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brenda Scott


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Consensus is that this passes WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 01:38, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Brenda Scott

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )
 * Delete: as non-notable actress. Quis separabit?  22:45, 28 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete While her career involved lots of roles, it is not clear any were significant. One may have been significant, but the notability of that film is in question, and we need more than one notable production role. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnpacklambert (talk • contribs) 01:49, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep She had major roles in at least Journey to Shiloh, Simon, King of the Witches, and The Road West, thus meeting WP:NACTOR. There are some sources about her on Google Books and it certainly shouldn't be deleted without a search of newspaper archives. --Colapeninsula (talk) 08:56, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:24, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:24, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:24, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:24, 29 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep She passes NACTOR, but also GNG. I did look through Newspaper archives, like suggested and added some sources to the article. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 00:35, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:NACTOR (i draw the nom's and deleter's attention to "3.Has made unique, prolific (my emphasis) or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment") and WP:GNG, article reflects this.Coolabahapple (talk) 01:11, 1 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.