Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brenda Siegel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  14:28, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Brenda Siegel

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:BLP of a politician, not properly sourced as having any claim to passing WP:NPOL. As always, non-winning candidates do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates -- the notability bar for politicians at NPOL is holding a notable political office, not just running for one, while candidates get articles only if either (a) they already have some other claim of notability for some other reason besides being an unsuccessful election candidate, or (b) they can demonstrate a credible reason why their candidacy should be seen as much more special than everybody else's candidacies, in some way that would satisfy the ten year test for enduring importance. But this demonstrates neither of those things, and is referenced to a mixture of primary sources that are not support for notability at all, and run of the mill local campaign coverage of the type that every candidate in every election can always show, which does not constitute evidence that she's earned special treatment that other unelected candidates aren't getting. Bearcat (talk) 13:10, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Vermont. Bearcat (talk) 13:10, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:28, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Limited coverage after the election, this is all I find . If there were a few more articles, I'd be ok as she would be a notable activist. Otherwise, not meeting BLP. Oaktree b (talk) 13:35, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete we have a long standing policy that one does not get a Wikipedia page simply for having lost an election. She can be adequately covered on the pages for the elections in which she was a candidate. SportingFlyer  T · C  10:09, 15 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.