Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brendan W. Gill


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 20:33, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Brendan W. Gill

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional and non-notable. Country Board of Freeholders does not imply notability  DGG ( talk ) 15:02, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: non-notable politician/officeholder; somewhat promotional but that could be addressed if notability threshold were reached. Quis separabit?  19:50, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:27, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:27, 5 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete members of county legislative bodies are generally not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:09, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Officeholders at the county level do not get an automatic WP:NPOL pass just for existing — at this level of office, a person gets a Wikipedia article only if they can be sourced over WP:GNG as significantly more notable than the norm for some encyclopedic reason. But nothing claimed or sourced here establishes that at all. Of the eight references here, five are primary sources — and the three that are actual media coverage in actual reliable sources are pretty WP:ROUTINE local pieces which are not substantively enough about him to vault him over GNG by themselves. Bearcat (talk) 18:57, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- entirely promotional article on a minor politician and political consultant. There's also possibility of COI / SPA editing. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:45, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as I also concur there's nothing at all for any applicable notability or actual substance. SwisterTwister   talk  05:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable local politician, not the subject of any in-depth coverage in any reliable secondary sources CrispyGlover (talk) 17:20, 14 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.