Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brenden Matthews


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:44, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Brenden Matthews

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I did a Google search on this person and I could not find ONE even remotely reliable source to establish the notability of him. The argument of my previously contested speedy was "Uhh, the guy CREATED Conky. All well and good, but if the PERSON isn't covered by any reliable sources, sorry - but inherited notability from Conky doesn't work.  Furthermore, NONE of the sources currently listed in the article are third-party, or what could even be considered reliable sources. Whose Your Guy (talk) 03:19, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

I am He Who Is Nominated for Deletion, and I would love to be erased from the internet. brenden (talk) 04:59, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect and merge into Conky. He is not notable enough on his own, I didn't find any reliable sources either. Just a sentence or two in the Conky article should be good enough. -- D•g Talk to me/What I've done 06:54, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:03, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:03, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete lack of reliable third-party sources plus request from subject of BLP. -Atmoz (talk) 16:04, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.