Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brennan Malone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Arizona Diamondbacks minor league players.  Sandstein  16:55, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Brennan Malone

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Minor baseball player, no statement in the article which would be notable, even if accurately sourced. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 03:40, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 03:40, 17 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Looks WP:TOOSOON. Can be covered via inclusion at Arizona Diamondbacks minor league players if and when warranted by minor league accomplishments. Dmoore5556 (talk) 04:18, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:41, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:41, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:41, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:41, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note:
 * Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Lubbad85  (☎)(Edits) 14:20, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - might be WP:TOOSOON, but currently doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NBASEBALL. Onel 5969  TT me 10:46, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge to Arizona Diamondbacks minor league players.. as the team's first round pick he should be included somewhere as people will be searching for him. This is the best place to put him for now as he doesn't have enough for his own article. Spanneraol (talk) 12:29, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge into Arizona Diamondbacks minor league players. Not enough yet in terms of coverage to merit an independent article. Best, GPL93 (talk) 14:31, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge per Spanneraol.-- Yankees10 22:43, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:04, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge the Article looks like the best option. I watched the Article and have also rod the other user comment. I think the Article could merge with Arizona Diamondbacks minor league players as other user said.Forest90 (talk) 12:13, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep passes GNG based on non-trivial coverage (ESPN, Charlotte Observer etc.) Subject is notable per WP:NEXIST. Subject does not have to pass WP:NBASEBALL and WP:GNG. Only one or the other:
 * 1) Major League Baseball first round draft pick
 * 2) Multi-million dollar contract
 * 3) Non-trivial secondary references Lubbad85  (☎)(Edits) 14:20, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment I have added references, and will continue. Lubbad85  (☎)(Edits) 14:49, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Being a first round draft pick and signing a contract are not relevant in this discussion.. baseball draft picks dont get the wide coverage that football and basketball ones do and sourcing looks pretty much routine to me. Spanneraol (talk) 15:40, 24 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep passes WP:GNG based on significant non-trivial coverage. No pretended compliance with WP:Before. WP:Not paper.  7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 15:08, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge per Spanneraol. Malmmf (talk) 24:13, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree this article passes WP:GNG.  D r e a m Focus  13:37, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
 * (Nominator statement) Merge. Still fails WP:GNG.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 19:25, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge I don't see anything that shows he meets any WP notability criteria. Coverage is typical sports reporting, but a merge seems reasonable to me. Papaursa (talk) 23:49, 26 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.