Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brent Woods, Indiana (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 07:11, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Brent Woods, Indiana
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Small subdivision/neighborhood/housing development within incorporated Shelbyville, Indiana. Built between 1954 and 1962. Knowing what "Brent" came from is not significant coverage to pass WP:GEOLAND#2, every newspapers.com mention other than this address in the classifieds is someone whose name is Brent Woods or a Brentwoods clothing brand. Reywas92Talk 00:00, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Reywas92Talk 00:00, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. Reywas92Talk 00:00, 17 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep - the origin of a place's name is certainly an encyclopedic bit. And the publication of a notable organization focused on history is certainly a reliable source. That provides all the notability required under WP:GEOFEAT. John from Idegon (talk) 00:08, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Here is the source for that, on page 773/63 of the pdf. It’s half of a two-sentence bio about one of the members of the Indiana Daughters board, not remotely significant encyclopedic coverage nor editorially reviewed historic content. Reywas92Talk 01:03, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete It is a subdivision or neighborhood and per our guidelines it will need WP:SIGCOV to be kept per WP:GEOLAND#2. Brent woods may or may not be a notable fictional subject, however this article does not pass WP:N and the article exists as a WP:COATRACK Lightburst (talk) 00:31, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Subdivision fails GELOAND2 due to lack of significant coverage. The DAR source is an incredibly trivial mention. Most names have some sort of story behind them; this does not make them notable. –dlthewave ☎ 03:35, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete this is a non-notable subdivision.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:04, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - while it exists, GEOLAND does not overrule WP:SIGCOV, WP:V, or WP:GNG. Even a populated place needs to be verified by more than three extremely brief listings. Bearian (talk) 16:33, 19 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.