Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bret Tyler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:30, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Bret Tyler

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 06:35, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: Another of the many hundreds of NN articles created by Dolovis in open and knowing defiance of consensus concerning applicable notability guidelines, and for which he received a community ban from new article creation. Fails NHOCKEY, no evidence the subject -- a journeyman in the semi-pro low minors with an ephemeral, undistinguished career -- meets the GNG.   Ravenswing   15:59, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable hockey player. I wonder if someone could do a group nomination of articles created by Dolovis.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:37, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: Bad idea, unfortunately. It's been tried, but there are two factors.  First off, I'm sure you've seen a faction of the AfD community increasingly hostile to bundled nominations, which in my personal POV has to do more with a hatred of deletion policy altogether than anything else.  The second is that Dolovis wasn't always wrong.  He did create some articles about notable players, and some of the NN players for whom he created articles became notable down the road.  However much of a pain in the ass it is, we do have to look at each case.   Ravenswing   04:01, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 19:24, 10 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails GNG and not finding significant coverage. Rlendog (talk) 21:35, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not meet WP:NHOCKEY. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   20:30, 16 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.