Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brett Joshpe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete without prejudice on later re-creation if reliable sources appear. — TKD::Talk 01:55, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Brett Joshpe

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

There is very little evidence of notability, and appears to be self-promotion. ETA: No page in the main namespace links to Brett Joshpe. john k 17:30, 13 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. May be an auto-bio, but it does mention a book, which would make him potentially notable.  It just needs to be wikified right?  •Malinaccier•  T / C  17:53, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The book has not yet been published, and, so far as I can tell, its publication cannot be confirmed - we are taking it on faith that this is true. If the book is published, we can bring back the article. john k 18:23, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Deroy Murdock here. I posted the page on Brett Joshpe, a colleague of mine in New York City. As I indicated in the edit section of the Joshpe article, he is co-authoring a political book forthcoming from Simon & Schuster. He also is selling Max Yasgur's farm, site of the 1969 Woodstock Music & Arts Festival, whose 38th anniversary is this week. As requested, I linked to a CNN article and another from the Washington Times as references. I have improved this article as I was asked. I believe Brett Joshpe is notable, and I object to this article's proposed deletion. -- Thank you, Deroy MurdockMurdock2000 17:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC) [I'll assume this counts as a Keep from the article's principal creator. john k 18:23, 13 August 2007 (UTC)]
 * Being the real estate agent on a famous property is not, I think, sufficient to qualify as notable, although reasonable people might differ on that. john k 18:23, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Wouldn't this be a conflict of interest problem here? Realkyhick 18:48, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The book is yet to be published, no verification aside from the Fox News story, just doesn't pass the notability test yet. Maybe later. Realkyhick 18:48, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete without comment. GreenJoe 18:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete for now; if the book comes out and is received in a strong enough manner to get it coverage from a wide range of reliable sources, notability might be passed, but right now I don't feel he meets WP:BIO. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:18, 13 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.