Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brett Nelson-Bond


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:09, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Brett Nelson-Bond

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 04:33, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:00, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:00, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:00, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep played over 170 games in the AIHL, the highest level of competition in Australia and was a member of the national team, competing at a number of world championships. Dan arndt (talk) 06:30, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails GNG going away. every source found (of which their are few non-stats sources) indicates WP:ROUTINE coverage which fails GNG. Fails NHOCKEY by playing in an amateur league that has not been proven to meet GNG consistently and in the third tier of the IIHF tournaments. Yosemiter (talk) 21:14, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:05, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails GNG miserably. Playing in the AIHL and/or the Australian national team is irrelevent until such time as it can be shown that participation in these entities would presume notability.  Given the abject failure of this player to generate any notable coverage, this seems unlikely.18abruce (talk) 00:11, 15 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.