Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brett Thorngren


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  19:02, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Brett Thorngren

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject of article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources hence fails WP:GNG. I can’t see him scaling WP:ANYBIO as well. Celestina007 (talk) 13:29, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:29, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:29, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:29, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:29, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:29, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

The subject has an extensive body of work in the music industry, where being the producer, mastering engineer, or and member tends to garner a passing mention in the publicity, reviews and catalogues. He is one of the first to use online music publishing via sites such as Perpetuity, SoundCloud, Reverbnation and MySpace (in its early days) to get his and other artists music out independent of the major labels. I’d happily add a discography, but understandably it will take a while to collate and code for inclusion. Elastic2303 (talk) 19:32, 1 January 2020 (UTC) Delete The article mainly rely upon primary sources and more reliable sources should be included. It fails to meet WP:GNG as per nom. Abishe (talk) 14:03, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: the sources I looked at were passing mentions. Can we find anything heftier? Bearian (talk) 20:53, 6 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.