Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brett Wilkinson (designer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Inkthis. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 19:41, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Brett Wilkinson (designer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Blatant self promotion. At first glance this appears notable, but not one of the references given mention the person in the article. Half the article, and all the references, are about the InkThis event but this is also by the same contributor. Dmol (talk) 11:23, 27 April 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 14:23, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 14:24, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Horrible, horrible WP article. Non-notable + self-promotion = nonsense. &mdash; Timneu22 · talk 16:52, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Inkthis, which Wilkinson co-founded (apparently) and which occupies the majority of the current article. This article is certainly not nonsense, and makes a claim to significance of the subject, but as yet fails to provide sufficient achievements to meet WP:ARTIST or sourcing to meet WP:N.  Ty  21:05, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * REdirect this to Inkthis (or vice versa). WE do not need both.  Peterkingiron (talk) 21:21, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.