Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brevity code


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete - a distribution restriction isn't something to tamper with. DS 22:54, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Brevity code
This is a dictionary definition followed by a paste of a glossary specific to the United States armed forces. The source that we've pasted into the article could perhaps be used as a reference for articles on military terminology or slang, but the paste of this one particular list does not make an encyclopedia article, and it is hard to imagine how it could become one. Further, it is not crystal clear to me that we can be republishing this; while unrelated to copyright, there is apparantly some sort of distribution limitation on the document. This limitation may perhaps be unenforceable, but I'm not sure what we would gain by pressing the matter; I suggest we can just link to this if we need it rather than republishing it. Jkelly 00:27, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Wiktionary per nom. Big  top  00:40, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Transwiki per nom. The list of codes (pdf) can be an external link at the bottom of the wiktionary article.  Ultra-Loser [ T  ] [  C  ]  02:22, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Transwiki. - Aerobird 02:42, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Wiktionary. So tagged. MER-C 06:42, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Transwiki This looks like wikiordinary articles. Daniel5127 &lt;Talk&gt; 07:44, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Transwiki Anjouli 07:50, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Transwiki per above. --Ineffable3000 21:50, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.