Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brew Dr. Kombucha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  19:59, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Brew Dr. Kombucha

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable beverage company that fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. The article cites several sources, but all of said sources make only trivial mentions of the company or are standard, press release -esque content; both of these are prohibited by NCORP. Only one sources cited by the article could be considered quaility, but even this source is based in large part off trivial mentions and quotes from the founder of Dr. Kombucha and thus is not entirely independent of the subject. SamHolt6 (talk) 18:54, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:07, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:07, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:07, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:07, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 13:39, 16 November 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep seems to be notable. That secondary sources may use press releases as sources doesn't mean they are prohibited, it's only where they don't add anything significant that they are not good sources. Paste magazine reference is also significant coverage and others with only a short paragraph provide context. Peter James (talk) 22:33, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 15:45, 23 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.