Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brewerfan.net


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-26 13:39Z 

Brewerfan.net

 * — (View AfD)

Non-notable fancruft, fails WP:WEB and WP:V. Alexa rank of 1,985,328, media mentions are either trivial or unverifiable. Article should be deleted. RWR8189 09:51, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment looking at the page's log, it seems like this article was twice subject to speedy deletion.--RWR8189 09:55, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete db-web. Danny Lilithborne 10:07, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. MER-C 11:27, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom.--Hu12 13:46, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:WEB -- Selmo  (talk) 17:01, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I'll resist the temptation to label this "sausagecruft", but a few passing mentions from reputable sources isn't enough to satisfy WP:WEB. Caknuck 21:14, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom as web and verifiability violations. Big  top  23:41, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This fails WP:WEB. Daniel5127 &lt;Talk&gt; 08:46, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep This article lists references below and we have many other articles where BF.net was mentioned if we can only look for them. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Adamb10 (talk • contribs) 21:03, 24 December 2006 (UTC).
 * Delete A trivial mention on an ESPN show does not equal notability. One Night In Hackney 23:28, 25 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.