Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Andrews (actor) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  03:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Brian Andrews (actor)
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Working actor, reasonable career, but I couldn't find sources available to confirm he meets WP:NACTOR / WP:GNG. Lots of mentions on less reliable sites/blogs. Weak keep in 2006 when our standards were much lower. Boleyn (talk) 07:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:59, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Television,  and Arizona.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  07:52, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: One quite notable role and some mildly notable ones have him meet WP:NACTOR, which is the applicable guideline. - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  22:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC)  PS- Added various sources and think the subject also meets WP:GNG with significant coverage in multiple reliable sources addressing the subject in depth and directly....:D
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep, roles add up to enough. Hyperbolick (talk) 08:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:02, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
 * delete: it's not about whether the roles are significant or not, it is about whether the role is significant or not. and so far... the only significant role i can find is his role as tommy doyle from halloween. other roles/movies listed in the article do not really make him significant, failing WP:NACTOR  brachy 08  (chat here lol) 08:56, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.