Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Daniel Smith


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete per consensus and per CSD A7. I'm sorry Sandpirate07, he sounds like an amazing person but the world is full of amazing people. There's nothing here that makes him stand out from the millions of other amazing people in the world and he's not notable by WP standards. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:08, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Brian Daniel Smith

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails general notability guideline. No substantive coverage by reliable third party sources - sources provided are self published, fails WP:RS/and doesn't specifically mention the subject. Cntras (talk) 08:38, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete No relevant GNews hits as far as I could tell. This page was created with the best of intentions (Edit summary: Created a page as a gift to show all that my great friend Brian has done before he goes off to war.), but that is unfortunately not relevant to this discussion. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 09:01, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete -  : biographical article lacking plausible assertion of notability. -- Rrburke (talk) 15:16, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clearly the 'friend' knows the subject very well, to the extent that it sounds like self-promotion! In any case patently not notable, I have tried searching - nothing.Asnac (talk) 16:53, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Per all of the above. WP is not for commemorative pages. --Crusio (talk) 15:33, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.