Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Douglas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 07:54, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Brian Douglas

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Procedural nom as I am unsure of what to do with this. This article was tagged as WP:CSD by User:Talentmuse with the edit summary (Delete page I submitted per Brian Douglas' request. Thank you.) which was correctly declined as multiple editors had contributed to it. User:Talentmuse then added an afd tag without completing the nom. The reason I am completing the nom is that the article had already been tagged for notability and COI concerns and a significant contributor advocates its deletion. Please note this version of the article as a lot of content was removed before it was tagged for CSD. I have no opinion either way. ascidian | talk-to-me  18:22, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete no assertion of importance or significance. Drawn Some (talk) 20:22, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * There is assertion of importance, it is almost the only content there is! The question is whether 20 years of being on US radio results in notability, which seems likely, if game-show losers are notable, so i say  weak keep.YobMod 11:04, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Seem to be a lot of sources, and he has done more than radio (making pilot of CM chaneel, worked for CNN). I added some refs, then removed them, as there seems to be more than one:This guy from the photo, and this one worked 20 years.YobMod 11:15, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, many claims of notablity have been removed in the past, although sourcing for them is trivial, that's why he looks non-notable at first glance.YobMod 11:19, 6 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. I don't understand Yobmod's points - WP:OTHER, and some vague claims of notability but no sourcing. All I can find is a very few bits of trivial coverage in the LA press. Fences and windows (talk) 04:29, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm tempted to say Keep because somebody requested deletion on behalf of Brian Douglas (apparently), but, no assertion of notability, even before User:Talentmuse touched it, so, reality says Delete--Unionhawk Talk 23:26, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.