Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Dunsby


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  18:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Brian Dunsby

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject is not inherently notable and does not pass GNG. Notability is reliant on one 'award'. Article would be best redirected to the page for that award: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen's_Award_for_Enterprise_Promotion isfutile:P (talk) 21:41, 17 November 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:52, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Subject is only recognized for one event that he organized, which won an award, thus not notable. Meatsgains (talk) 03:24, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep He didn't win the most important enterprise award in the country for organising the Harrogate Christmas market - important thought that is!  It was for forty years of work building enterprise in the region. Meets WP:ANYBIO for the award, and WP:GNG. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 16:10, 26 November 2015 (UTC).


 * Note adding material from the National Archives. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 17:29, 26 November 2015 (UTC).


 * ✅ R.F. 2015-12-2Z17:17

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:00, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:31, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:31, 3 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for now and draft and userfy at best as the current sourcing is simply not convincing enough and although I found more at Books and News for starters, it would at best be better for him to be mentioned at the Yorkshire Business Market's article, not independently notable for a separate article yet. SwisterTwister   talk  06:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Please provide the additional sources you found. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 12:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC).


 * Note additional documents received under FOI, so may well be yet more RS to add. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 01:54, 5 December 2015 (UTC).


 * Keep It has been significantly improved. --MurderByDeletionism"bang!" 19:30, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Refs look ok now. I considered voting delete when this was first put up for afd, but decided to sit on the fence. As mentioned the article has been much improved. Szzuk (talk) 20:27, 6 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.