Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Gilbert (actor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nja 247 13:23, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Brian Gilbert (actor)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not pass WP:ENT. Credits include "Kid #5" and "Kid with the list". Wperdue (talk) 22:24, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - IMDB profile page for those interested. I'm not saying this proves notability.  Ceran  thor 23:08, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I copied and pasted this from the top of the main entry. It is from the original editor: Dear Wikipedia users please refrain from deleting the Brian Gilbert (actor) page it is to promote the actor Brian Gilbert and is an informative source that our company decided to put on wikipedia. I am Brian Gilbert the actor and I am on IMDB so as you can imagine I am very close to the subject of this wikipedia page. Wperdue (talk) 06:09, 9 May 2009 (UTC)wperdue
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  —  Salih  ( talk ) 06:49, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice. And gently Userfy back to the author. I feel for this youngster... I very much do. And can admire the work he put in to create a wiki article that looks properly encyclopedic.. surprising for a beginner. But he does not understand wikipedia requirements for sources, nor the wiki guidelines concerning COI and self-promotion, else he would not have made the plea that he did. His 2 minor roles might well become dozens over the next few years, and I would myself then be proud to reintroduce a properly sourced article for the lad. For now, I'd encourage him to seek Facebook and Myspace for "promoting" himself. Do more Brian. Make that splash. Then come on back.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 09:35, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete the only solid reference really establishing notability is this from the NY Times. A few more like that and he'd be notable enough for an article. But not at this point. Dlabtot (talk) 18:02, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Notability is not establisdhed, and body of work does not indicate that it can be established at this time. -- Whpq (talk) 16:03, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly not notable.  Enigma msg  22:31, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Userfy - COI, much?--Unionhawk Talk E-mail 12:13, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.