Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian H. Robb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 09:13, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Brian H. Robb

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:ANYBIO. No significant coverage, no awards, no widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his specific field. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Brian H Robb is the director of prestigious cbcalliance - Coldwell Banker and enough news articles about him is presented in the article including from The Washington Times, Bizjournals.com etc. Moreover the Afd tag is placed by the user ,who tried to blank the page and speed the wikipage accusing some other reason. But here he is telling another reason towards deleting this page. Always :) (talk) 14:18, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * — Note to closing admin: Alwayssmileguys (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD.


 * Delete: Non-notable per WP:1E - the lawsuit seems to be his only claim to notability. Kolbasz (talk) 15:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment Ajmal Kasab is a terrorist responsible for 2008 Mumbai attacks alone and why should a terrorist have a wiki page ??? and here Brian H Robb is the director of a prestigious cbcalliance as well. Always :) (talk) 15:25, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment WP:1E didnt tell, you can't create wiki for person's like Brian H Robb. Instead it says if substantial news reference from main stram news website is thr, it can be created. his lawsuit, which later revealed the corruption in Education Management Corporation - has lot of relevant links from main stream medias and it was a big news, also the CEO of Education Management Corporation resigned due to the lawsuit settlement.

Always :) (talk) 15:38, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: Whilst I agree that the subject probably does not meet the criteria for notability - his notoriety seems to be entirely based on one court case - it also does seem to me that there may be an ulterior motive for wanting the article deleted. Deb (talk) 16:09, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Being involved in a lawsuit is not a criterion for notability. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:57, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Lack of notability. The secondary sources focus on the event rather than the person. --bonadea contributions talk 08:42, 26 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment - This article's creator, User:Alwayssmileguys, has been blocked indefinitely for paid editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:32, 26 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Sorely fails WP:BASIC and I can't find sources to ameliorate that. Sam Sailor Talk! 16:06, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per Magnolia677 fails WP:GNG sources are more about the event rather than the subject.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:56, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as there's hardly much convincingly better. SwisterTwister   talk  17:33, 27 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.